Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[Minimalist]

By that logic, the vast majority of respected Atheist Historians and scholars (who accept his historicity) are not ''true Atheists'' either because they do not toe the line.

You see, Mess.  I don't give a flying fuck what anyone else thinks.  Also don't tell  us what "atheists" think.  You have enough trouble with your own bullshit.  I am not, like you, always looking for some "authority" to tell me that I'm right.  I am capable of independently evaluating evidence and all you have are the rantings of later believers who survived the purges of your 'holy' church long enough to make it into the Big Book of Fables. 

Find some real evidence.  You have singularly failed to do that.