RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 7, 2015 at 2:29 pm
(June 7, 2015 at 2:27 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why would evidence for jesus need to be alot? I think, that if your chosen example for comparison is hannibal, you're barking up the wrong tree. I love that you're tripling down and rewording the same contention as though it weren't vapidly transparent.
Watch how easy this is. Hannibal is mythical and legendary, just like jesus.
(crossed the fucking alps with a train of elephants my ass...lol)
ru-roh.
It's not a ''re-wording'' as I explicitly clarified my point in my original post - it's you who willfully misinterpreted it and used it a strawman, attempting to assert that I said ''No Jesus = No History'' is either a genuine misinterpretation or disingenuous. The context of my post was attempting to stress the historical standard of the ancient world.