RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 7, 2015 at 4:27 pm
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2015 at 4:28 pm by TheMessiah.)
(June 7, 2015 at 4:22 pm)abaris Wrote:(June 7, 2015 at 4:19 pm)TheMessiah Wrote: I've responding to those claims, it begs to question why I have been accused of being ''pretend Atheist'' at-least two or three times.
That would be because you do nothing but argue the theist case in all of your threads.
It's not a Theist claim. It's a Historical claim. There is a difference.
It's not ''Christians believe Jesus existed'' and ''Atheists don't'' --- it's more along the lines of ''Atheist Historians agree he existed'' whereas ''Non Historian Atheists do not.''
It's why the historicity of Jesus is accepted among most Atheist scholars/historians; that changes across Atheist Historians and non-Atheist Historians.