Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[CapnAwesome]

It's not a Theist claim. It's a Historical claim. There is a difference.

On the same lines as global warming denying is a scientific claim. Truth is there's neither evidence for Jesus existing nor for his non existence. There can be a lot of speculations, but there's no evidence to be presented, since - to our present knowledge - there is none.

I don't understand what people mean on here a lot when they say 'no evidence' There is lots of evidence on both sides, just that evidence is of varying quality.