RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 8, 2015 at 4:07 pm
(This post was last modified: June 8, 2015 at 4:08 pm by Mudhammam.)
(June 8, 2015 at 4:02 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Ok - so you are selective.I'm selective about what? For one, my standard of evaluation would be the same: What do the sources say? What would we expect to appear in the writers of that era? When do the sources appear? How many independent relevant attestations? Second, you're comparing apples and oranges... and by "one book" you mean the Gospel of Mark?
P.S. Both appear within the pages of only one book.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza