RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 9, 2015 at 2:37 am
(June 9, 2015 at 2:27 am)robvalue Wrote: People may generally agree that there was a HJ, but they don't agree on what that actually means.
Yeah, what historians consider HJ, or what they generally agree upon is a Jew that got cruciced by the romans ---- in regards to ''what it means'' then there is a stronger debate/argument to be had.
Some historians think he was signifcant, others not so much.