Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[Mudhammam]

Whew, good thing thats not the mythicist argument huh...nutcase. No need to repost what's already been discussed, but proponents of christ myth theory are perfectly comfortable saying "there may have been a jesus". Lets see what a mythicist actually does argue.....eh?

"the theory that no historical Jesus worthy of the name existed, that Christianity began with a belief in a spiritual, mythical figure, that the Gospels are essentially allegory and fiction, and that no single identifiable person lay at the root of the Galilean preaching tradition."

Take a crack at that, rather than pitching straw?

I was replying to Parker... not making a statement about what "mythicists actually argue." Whew... try to keep up... dipshit.