Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[TheMessiah]

-Ah, good, so it is the same reference as usual.  -Ignoring- fraud or interpolation...to be kind, then both accounts are simply the narrator relating things that they were told...and no one is disputing that people, like the experts, say things.  Next?

If you had read the passage, you'd have seen that the interpolation was blatantly and explicitly addressed; all of your ''concerns'' such as Tacticus repeating claims were addressed and offered with context to as why it is considered reliable.

I think by this point you are just wasting my time.