Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[TheMessiah]

I am late to this thread, and I have noticed this pattern with the OP too.  He reiterates the same point over and over.  It is a    What is the saying?  Oh yes, "Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results = the definition of insanity.

Yes.  But recognizing a pattern does nothing to prevent it from occurring again.  I expect another thread on the subject of whether there was a historical Jesus or not within a few months of this one being abandoned.  And I expect the arguments to be pretty much the same. It is not as if it is likely that anyone is going to dig up a new document in the next couple of months.

This is ironic coming from a user who accused me of being a misogynist several times without a shred of proof, proving yourself not to be very ''skeptical'' as you claim, solely based on the fact that I did not like Feminism. I smell a hypocrite...