RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 9, 2015 at 7:03 pm
(This post was last modified: June 9, 2015 at 7:07 pm by TheMessiah.)
(June 9, 2015 at 6:59 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:(June 9, 2015 at 6:51 pm)TheMessiah Wrote: This is ironic coming from a user who accused me of being a misogynist several times without a shred of proof, proving yourself not to be very ''skeptical'' as you claim, solely based on the fact that I did not like Feminism. I smell a hypocrite...
You must be a glutton for punishment, if you will pardon the homely old saying:
(June 7, 2015 at 3:37 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: You seem to be confused about the quote function. My post in which I stated that you are a misogynist was quoted over and over again. That was not me writing it over and over, that was people using the quote function. You might want to read up on how message boards like this one function.
You also are confused about the purpose of the post. It was a response to someone else, not to you. I did not expect to convince you of anything with it.
You might also want to work on your skills with links, as yours does not take one to any particular post of mine, but to page 14 of a thread.
You really are exposing yourself to ridicule with the things you state. Of course I do not expect you to stop doing that.
Are you incapable of learning anything? Did you not look at the links before, and see that my post was quoted over and over, and I did not post it over and over? Are you really that clueless?
You have berated me for repeating something despite you ignoring my questions of why you libelled me on another thread.
Edit - Are you incapable of reading what you had liked? Or simply incapable of remembering? You had given thanks for previous comments which had thrown the same libelious claims, hence the point stands. You giving thanks to several libellious comments and then failing to provide a reasonable explanation to as the rationale behind the libel.