(June 11, 2015 at 11:15 am)Dystopia Wrote: Fascism only applies to a certain doctrine some dictators follow - A dictator may not be fascist - He may be a theocrat, authoritarian, oligarch, communist/stalinist, pretty much everything compatible with a minimum of monopolised power. I think you should really inform and educate yourself on this since it's very clear you don't know anything about political systems and most of your opinions are about what you want to be true regardless of what it factually is.
Funny - Hitchens's lasts words were "capitalism, downfall" and he considered himself a marxist in some instances (mostly trotskist) - A system that, depending on your approach, can be compatible with some kind of dictatorship
Oh and some dictators do need consent to rule - That's why they are elected in the first place
Wow, your apology for a dictator is on par with the crap theology.
What do you want me to say to this bullshit? No I will NEVER value a dictator. I don't give one fuck how "kind" you try to paint that position. It still amounts to those under that position not having the ability to remove that person. Seriously go fuck yourself if you think that is moral.
And claiming a dictator is elected still does not mean shit. Mob rule by vote does not constitute morality. Our secular government concepts in the west do not give absolute power to one person, voting by itself does not equate to morality, it is simply one part of governing . Iran has elections too, but unless you are a Shiite favored by that government, it is damned near impossible if not deadly to live openly expressing anything else besides the social norms.
