More things against creationism

[robvalue]

Well sure, my objection doesn't make it untrue. But this theory doesn't make any predictions, except trying to claim retroactive credit. It offers no details, no method, no way the conclusion has been found, no way to test it... it's entirely empty. It would need to be replaced with an actual explanation before it could explain anything. It's just a bunch of vague magic words, it's no better than a horoscope. Worse, in fact.

It doesn't even say what the fuck God is, for starters, so it's not even coherent. "Something made everything". That's not a theory, I wouldn't even wipe my arse with it.

Or maybe: "The thing that made everything made everything." A tautology based on an unfounded assumption. Trific!

I suppose what I'm saying is it isn't even specific enough to be able to be "true". Even with the new "Science is true, but God did science!" approach.