RE: Is the ''Only a minority of Muslims are radical'' true?
June 13, 2015 at 9:06 am
(This post was last modified: June 13, 2015 at 9:09 am by TheMessiah.)
(June 13, 2015 at 9:04 am)abaris Wrote:(June 13, 2015 at 9:00 am)TheMessiah Wrote: That 2.4% constitute a specific age group in addition to a specific socio-economic class, which most Muslims aren't.
Read the study, you twat.
Quote:Methods
A cross-sectional survey of a representative population sample of men and women aged 18–45, of Muslim heritage and recruited by quota sampling by age, gender, working status, in two English cities. The main outcomes include self-reported health, symptoms of anxiety and depression (common mental disorders), and vulnerability to violent radicalization assessed by sympathies for violent protest and terrorist acts.
Nothing about selecting a socio-economic class, but across the board.
Again, thanks for proving my point: and see my edited posts citing Wikipedia in addition to other shcolarly studies which completely debunk this ''poverty causes terrorism'' fantasy.
The study is across the board, they sampled rich, middle class and working class. Only a minority of Muslims were militant, yet from that minority, a common theme was wealth privilege.
I'm well aware that a minority of Muslims are unsurprisingly, militant. What however, the study showed is that the minority who were militant shared the common theme of being privileged, hence why wealth was listed as a risk factor.
What that study is saying is that the Muslims who turn to terrorism aren't the poor and deprived, they're the rich fuckers who are born well-off.
