Hello, Anyone interested in a debate?

[The Grand Nudger]

I am afraid you are going to need to tell me why. 

I already have.

If a person engages in acts they subjectively believe to be best/correct/right and the determination of the quality of the act is based on the Subject at the time of action; then it directly follows that any action the Subject engages in is best/correct/right.

-all that follows is that the subject -believes- it to be the correct action.  That different actors would pick different actions as those "best actions" is the very crux of subjective moral statements.  That some actors would consider a portion of the "best" actions of another set immoral is likewise the very crux of subjective moral statements.  Subjective morality does not claim that all moral actions are right.  It claims that morality is subjective. Period. You can plead for your impositions all you like and I won't grant them. They mean nothing to me and everything to you. This line of conversation is transparent and tiresome. Do..you...wish..to pitch straw? If you do, that's fine..because granting you all of this ridiculous shit.......you still haven't begun to argue for the position which you claimed to have an argument -for-.

If people don't appeal to a fictitious entity they only have two other poorly formed choices of your own design.

So what...really? Sounds to me like you just gave two examples that -completely- discredit your position. Had you let me argue the fairies side I would -at least- have avoided offering definitive refutation of it, as you've done. I guess people have at least two options -other- than your appeal to myth......there goes necessity, there goes your argument. Good day to you sir.

Otherwise we must say the Subject engages in actions they subjectively believe to not be best/correct/right.

You have a fixation with telling people what they must do which I find entirely unsurprising.