(June 18, 2015 at 8:07 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Just to toss you a bone......there's no reason to think that the supernatural being would be bound by natural law - that's why our system of logic is untrustworthy "there" in the first place. The notion that a supernatural being would be bound by natural law, is, itself......pretty much untrue by definition. If it were true...it would just be a "natural being", eh?
If you believe in supernatural beings...the idea that they are not bound by natural law is a fairly rational belief to hold -about- supernatural beings. After all, you're only repeating their defining attribute as distinct from natural beings.
Agreed.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh