RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 19, 2015 at 5:39 pm
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2015 at 5:42 pm by Mudhammam.)
(June 17, 2015 at 8:26 pm)Rhythm Wrote: LOL...I missed this before but...Nestor....the thing you thought that mythicists didn't have a good explanation for, that was an example of their laziness in describing things as fiction turned out to be what?I'm pretty sure historians know that almost all ancient texts contain fiction in their accounts.
Fiction?
Fiction in text =/= text is fiction.
All you have to do to see an example of the laziness I'm referring to is scroll up to the post above yours:
Quote:Even the accounts of Jesus in the gospel are in clear contradiction of one another, which further discredits him as a historical figure.The stupidity in that remark would be shocking if it wasn't so typical.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza