Q about arguments for God's existence.

[Iroscato]

In fairness to CL, she's already admitted to believing and having faith without needing solid scientific evidence.
And we all persist in asking her for scientific evidence?

Everyone sit back, take a deep breath, and stop fucking persecuting the Christian! 

Hey, thank you for this post! :-)

---

It is far more logical to instead consider that nature creates nature. With the intelligent creator hypothesis you just get a healthy dose of infinite regress, requiring special pleading like "Oh it's not natural, it's SUPERnatural!"

Tell me CL, how much research have you done into alternate theories for the origin of the universe?

That is your opinion. Whether it is more logical or not, it is, nonetheless, something that cannot be explained and has not been scientifically proven. In my opinion, it is not more logical.

That is where we dramatically disagree.

Apologies if I come across as stand-offish, I'm more used to dealing with creationists and arrogant oafs. You at least seem like a fundamentally decent human being, which helps.
What of the second part of my post, however? Have you looked into the theories that have been formulated?
Bear in mind science is still very much in its infancy, yet it's unlocking the secrets of the universe at a quite astonishing rate.