RE: Q about arguments for God's existence.
June 20, 2015 at 5:34 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2015 at 5:35 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(June 20, 2015 at 5:12 pm)Iroscato Wrote:(June 20, 2015 at 4:46 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Hey, thank you for this post! :-)
That is your opinion. Whether it is more logical or not, it is, nonetheless, something that cannot be explained and has not been scientifically proven. In my opinion, it is not more logical.
That is where we dramatically disagree.
Apologies if I come across as stand-offish, I'm more used to dealing with creationists and arrogant oafs. You at least seem like a fundamentally decent human being, which helps.
What of the second part of my post, however? Have you looked into the theories that have been formulated?
Bear in mind science is still very much in its infancy, yet it's unlocking the secrets of the universe at a quite astonishing rate.
Haha, thanks for the compliment and apology accepted of course. Are creationists automatically not "fundamentally decent humans?"
![Tongue Tongue](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I have read/learned about the big bang in (catholic :-p ) school. As for the origin of the very first "thing" to ever have existed, no, I have never heard anything on that other than it either came from nothing or it always has been.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh