Q about arguments for God's existence.

[Longhorn]

It's a weak theory. And it's not exactly yours, only in the sense that you believe in it.

You're jumping to the most improbable explanation that doesn't explain anything....
Except you're not. You already believed that. That's the thing with believers: everything is presupposed.

I'll put it this way: you were already taught the conclusion without going along any line of reasoning. That's what religion does. It doesn't examine the evidence. It trots out a conclusion and then tries to fit evidence to support it.

Kalam is just wrong upon wrong upon more fucking wrong.

I don't know. And I accept that I don't know. We can fantasize all day, but we don't know. But you believe. That's the difference.

Well, the notion that it's a weak theory is still your opinion. I respect your opinion, but of course, I disagree. I think your theory is a weak theory.

But that's fine.

That's why each of us believes what we do, and at the end of the day it is still something that science and our natural laws have not been able to explain or find proof of, so we are left to each respect the other's theories.

Except that this opinion of mine that your theory is weak is an informed opinion, based on the improbability of what you are proposing.

My theory? Oh boy, how fascinating. Please, tell me what my theory is. I'd love to know.

I don't have a theory, Cat Lady. I accept that I don't know. I don't hazard guesses on topics I can't grasp. Simple as that.

I don't have to respect your theory. I think it's garbage.