RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 22, 2015 at 12:13 pm
But I have reviewed the data and find no evidence...(actual evidence, mind you) to support any of the myriad positions for a HJ. Carrier has systematically taken the evidence apart and, as with Price, concluded that it is a fantasy.
When the HJ-ers can agree among themselves what their godboy was maybe a rational discussion would be possible. But right now they each seem to see whatever they wish to see.
And THAT is a huge red flag for historicity.
When the HJ-ers can agree among themselves what their godboy was maybe a rational discussion would be possible. But right now they each seem to see whatever they wish to see.
And THAT is a huge red flag for historicity.