Answers needed

[Louis Chérubin]

Yeah... if you look at the descriptor next to my avatar, you'll realize, OP, that I don't let up.  "Tenacious" is the word SteelCurtain used to describe me not too long ago, and I think he was being nice.  

I will keep posting this until you answer.  Thanks.

Well, you got your answer rex!  Happy now! What, did you actually think that we would answer honestly!  You should know better than that.
The whole forum knows he's not about to go and start killing people irrespective of his beliefs. He just can't bring himself to acknowledge that, for then, why is god needed, if his internal moral compass (The only true one, natures one) does the job anyway.
If you are going to live your life based on someone elses dogma, then that stops you from thinking for yourself, and that's where the danger lies.

Ignoramus,

I'm interested in the fact that you think you're not "living your life based on someone else's dogma." Do you think you aren't patterning your beliefs on previously conceived ideas? If you are implying that my thinking is blind following, what evidence do you have for that?

---

"The basic elements that form life is easily found in nature and is abundant is space as well." Just because the parts exits? Really? I have the ingredients for chocolate chip cookies in my kitchen. Unfortunately, that doesn't mean they form chocolate chip cookies. Maybe if I wait long enough? That's a yummy thought! JK

Try to put them out in the universe and see what happens in a few billion years. On the other hand you could open a science book.

Abaris,

I know you've heard arguments for the "mathematical improbability of evolution." So, I won't rehash . . . . However, I do realize the cookie analogy is dumb. :-) I think it's getting too late on the West Coast.