RE: Answers needed
June 26, 2015 at 3:01 pm
(This post was last modified: June 26, 2015 at 3:04 pm by Louis Chérubin.)
Good morning!
I'm having slight brain overload from reading all the different trains of thought from last night, so I'll just respond here to some of the recurring topics.
lol. Sorry for the apologies too. Can you tell I'm Canadian?
lol. I do need to be more sensitive to the context. Please delete that word from my comment.
I'm having slight brain overload from reading all the different trains of thought from last night, so I'll just respond here to some of the recurring topics.
- Several people have inquired what I mean by “god.” I mean a super-natural force evident through nature.
- The topic of atheism and origins also came up. What is the purpose of distinguishing between definition and practice? Atheism is the lack of belief in the existence of god(s) (NOAD). It follows that atheists don’t believe the universe came into existence through god. This is a description of the atheist’s ultimate conclusion, not his thought process, so please don’t be offended.
- Most people have assumed that I take the existence of God as a priori truth. I’ve stated several times that my interpretation of evidence (facts that are available to everyone, nothing new) is what leads me to God.
- Regarding my motives, I’m a premed university student on summer break. No sermons being prepared. :-) Though why would you care?
lol. Sorry for the apologies too. Can you tell I'm Canadian?
(June 26, 2015 at 2:37 pm)LastPoet Wrote: Atheistic scientists....
I swear, can't tell a joke to the real thing with these fellows. How can someone with so much lack of knowlege even function?
lol. I do need to be more sensitive to the context. Please delete that word from my comment.