Do you have the right to be an atheist?

[downbeatplumb]

My point is that the existence of a "God" is more probable than the non-existence of such.

No it isn't.

I think that this probable existence of a "God" makes pure atheism illogical because pure atheism is 100% believing in the non-existence of a "God" which is not the case.

Gods existence is not probable and indeed is very improbable.

I am currently 100% atheist but am willing to be swayed by evidence. Can a 100% theist say the same? 

Since this has turned out to be a debate kind of thread what i'd from anyone else including you would be to tell me i'm wrong and give me convincing input that points out the fact that i am wrong.

Well there is no evidence for a god nor is there any reason to think that such a thing exists. So there's that.

But on the subject of "the right to be an atheist", I have no option but to be an atheist and class myself as such because I do not believe in god.