(June 29, 2015 at 3:31 pm)pool Wrote: When i said current scientifc understanding i meant as in the scientific understanding at time t(t being the current time).
What i meant was that current scientific understanding of concept 'g' = scientific understanding of concept 'g' at time t.
If the concept 'g' was discovered/invented at time 't' as of then it is natural but as in time t-n it is supernatural because at time t-n their scientific understanding was not equal to the scientific understanding at time t.When i said current scientific understanding i was trying to explain how,concept 'g' discovered/invented at time 't' and is entirely normal may be supernatural at time t-n(because the scientific knowledge at time t directly contradicts with the scientific knowledge at time t-n),by using time to further emphasize the relativity in question.
This is where we are disagreeing.
Do you agree that whether or not an object is supernatural is a quality of that object?
