Do you have the right to be an atheist?

[Holden Caulfield]

@Everyone else, Yeah,well i agree i don't fully or even partially understand these terms.
What i'm saying is this:

There wouldn't be atheism is there wasn't theism.
Theism is itself build on the claim that there is a god and they don't even know what god is - they believe in something which is nothing.
If theism itself is a faulty ism then wouldn't it make atheism also faulty(ah,idk my analogy better explains what i'm trying to convey).

(Analogy)
Theists: cat is a dog.
Atheists: I don't completely agree OR i disagree.(please note:It is a OR not a AND)
Me: lol cat is not a dog,cat is cat.



Now that there are no more theists
So where does atheists stand now?
Now doesn't atheists have the burden of proof?

This is NONSENSE.  Your trying to build yourself as smarter than everyone ever.  Your not.

I post the actual argument but mr. wizard already did.

Here's a simple analogy for you.
Theist: The world was created by a spaghetti monster.
Atheist:  Show me some proof that what you say is true.
You: I have no idea.

I really don't what you are trying to say at all.  Atheism exists just as general term to distinguish like minded people who don't believe in theism.  Of course atheism only exists because of theism...since if there were no theists we'd ALL be atheists.  We wouldn't need a term then maybe, but it'd be the same meaning as we'd all be atheists.