(July 5, 2015 at 2:09 pm)pool Wrote: Yes.
But what you're missing is the part where i explicitly states that the burden of proof is on the atheists in the event of considering theism as bullshit and choosing not to dissolve atheism.
If you're confused as to why atheism have to be dissolved in the event theism is declared bullshit - read the quote again and more carefully you will eventually understand it.
@downbeatplumb, My first language is Malayalam,my second language is Hindi,English is my third language.
I understand your position and it is wrong.
Let me see if I can explain this.
I am an atheist as I do not believe that there is a god.
What I have not said is that there is definitely no god, as things stand I would place the likelihood of there being god as being as near to zero as makes no difference. So I remain unpersuaded.
What should I label myself as if not atheist.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
