(July 6, 2015 at 3:22 pm)pool Wrote:(July 6, 2015 at 3:17 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: There is no necessity to define all gods in order to understand that people with specified god beliefs fall under the heading of 'theist'.
Theism is a huge category, under which, the belief in many gods fall.
But if a set X is supposed to have only natural numbers and if a non-natural number belongs to X,that is,is an element of X.
Doesn't that mean that the definition of X is wrong?
Why do you imply that all the elements doesn't have to be natural numbers and the description of the set X as the set that consists of natural numbers would still hold in the event that a element x of X is identified as not a natural number?
Your arguments are nonsense. You attempt metaphors that are clearly inapt.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.