(July 7, 2015 at 10:27 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote:(July 7, 2015 at 9:46 pm)Marsellus Wallace Wrote: so precise ?
I added the word "about" before stating the number, isn't that enough to say that it's NOT precise. May be the list is missing 2,3,or maybe 20 movies, but that is pretty much the range of error for that list.
Range of error of 20 movies? How about one of 313709?
There you go, Einstein. As I already imagined, someone already did this, and they did it better than you. It's their job, after all.
This thread should have been dismissed at first sight of citing wikipedia as a believable source, given it's scope. Rather, it's not wiki's fault, they don't pretend they know everything about every subject, it's yours for getting your statistics from them in such a way.
Can you get the titles of those 331,434 feature films, genius ? it's just a number, and you can't tell what's behind it.
they certainly add movies from all around the world, even chinese and indian movies, all I wanted was any english speaking movie, and wikipedia provided that list.
wikipedia is not the safest place to get my info, but the best so far to get the job done.