(July 8, 2015 at 2:05 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: You speak through miss interpretation and only prices of the stories. Any one can take the word kill and put it by itself and instantly think bad about it. Polititians and lawyers are notorious for that. I guess that makes them all knowing and straight forward people though right. You don't know me but think you do because of your incapacity to comprehend something that you don't want to understand, and that you cannot control.
I condemn evil all the time.
Condemn chaos.
You might want to work on your language skills, as some of that is just gibberish.
As for the story in Numbers 31, little children are murdered. Young girls are raped. Unless you are a sick freak, ordinarily, you would regard such things as immoral. However, because it is commanded by your god, your natural tendencies you disavow, and instead say that these obviously immoral things are somehow good. That is, assuming you are not some sick freak, which I freely admit I cannot be certain of, as I do not know you. Statistically speaking, though, it is a good guess, and it is also the non-insulting guess to make about you.
However, since you are making such a fuss about the fact that I don't know you, are you now telling us that your natural tendency is to regard the murder of small children as a good thing, and the rape of young girls as a good thing? Have I made a mistake in supposing that you ordinary would regard those things as wrong? By all means, clear up this point if you wish. But in the case of most religionists, they are normally against such things, but their natural morality is perverted by such sick stories when they believe their god approves. Of course, that does not apply to sick freaks. To a sick freak, the story may well seem normal and fine.
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
