Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 26, 2025, 11:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 11:35 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(July 9, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Notice how he didn't answer the reply.

This is why using "ignore" is for pussies and charlatans.

As Frank Herbert wrote in Dune, "Those who see only what they wish are doomed to rot in the stink of their own perceptions."

Randy has chosen that route.

Can't remember who it was who told Luther, "You have chosen a hard road, Little Monk."

Parkers Tan, you know I love ya, but I can't blame Randy for ignoring ad hominem posts. He's here to have a discussion with people who genuinely want to discuss these issues.  Shy

I tried that. That isn't what he wants. He ignores what he cannot answer, and he mocks those who don't accept his preconceived notions. He refuses to put up evidence when he makes bald claims; unlike you, he doesn't refer to his beliefs as beliefs, he behaves as if they're fact. And when none of that works, he himself engages in personal attacks.

He doesn't want discussion. He wants a podium for his views.

Great. But they will be questioned. The fact that he cannot stomach questions, the fact that he hides uncomfortable views, is very unconvincing. We have here a guy who says that God is on his side, and yet here he is, afraid to cross opinions with certain members. Daniel walked willingly into the lion's den, with faith that Yahweh would protect him ... but Randy cannot stand to read some offensive posts?

Some god. Some faith.

You I respect because you don't portray your beliefs as objective truths. You're wise enough to understand that your views are yours and they don't apply to everyone. I'm happy to discuss all those topics without personal attacks, because you don't pretend as if you're Moses coming down from the mountain with graven truth. You don't have the ego, or the bombast, or the foolishness of pride, and you don't ignore people simply for making you uncomfortable.

You've earnt my respect. Randy hasn't; and by his liberal use of ignore, likely never will.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach - by Thumpalumpacus - July 10, 2015 at 1:35 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 4790 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 13047 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 26394 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 20029 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 15244 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 46722 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 34756 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 23382 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 464202 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 8682 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)