Your views on MARRIAGE

[Catholic_Lady]

So just to clarify, as a general rule, you don't think it's better for society for children to be raised in a stable home with both parents?

No, I don't, and I wouldn't not even if all families were perfect(no such thing though). There might be far better ways to raise children than this.

Ok, so here, you are answering my question with a definitive "No." Meaning you definitively do not think that as a general rule it's better for society if children are raised in a stable home with both parents (as opposed to a non stable home with 2 parents, or a stable home with 1 parent, or any other scenario).

1. So if you definitively do not think the scenario presented above (stable home, 2 parents) is the ideal scenario, then what do you think would be a better scenario?

2. You then said there might be far better ways to raise children than in a stable home with 2 parents. What are your ideas/theories on what ways might be far better?

(I have numbered these to show that they are two separate questions addressing your two sentences. If you could answer them both, that would greatly help me understand your views. Thank you.)

Catholic_Lady:
Another question in regards to the bolding... does this mean  you think the bearing of children should be "controlled?" If so, how?

Yes, I do. Of course I do. I want the species to survive.

Why, by restricting the number of children allowed to be born overall, of course. I couldn't care less if for every kid who doesn't get to be born now, another 1 trillion do in the remote future.

This is a lot more straight forward.

You are saying you believe the number of children people are allowed to have should be controlled, and that this should be done by restricting the number of children allowed to be born.

Can you elaborate on how the government should go about dictating the number of children being born, and how the government would enforce this law?

Thanks so much!