Premise: Decay rates indicate that the Earth is ancient.
It seems to me that what you are surmising is that decay rates were massively accelerated right up to the point where science started observing and detecting them thus giving the impression that a 10,000 year old Earth was really 4.5 billion years old.
If this where the case then wouldn't most of the Earth's (short) history be incredibly radioactive?
It seems to me that what you are surmising is that decay rates were massively accelerated right up to the point where science started observing and detecting them thus giving the impression that a 10,000 year old Earth was really 4.5 billion years old.
If this where the case then wouldn't most of the Earth's (short) history be incredibly radioactive?