(October 14, 2010 at 7:54 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Haha you act as if my mistake changes the argument, it does not. 100/4,500,000,000 total time is still far too small of a observation to make any kind of stastical conclusion. My argument still stands un-refuted.
You are obviously not a scientist.
I proved that we can conduct an experiment to measure the decay rates of various isotopes even though their decay rates are much longer than the length we observe them for by measuring them in large quantities. What i showed you was an example of the principle, i WAS NOT saying that they have only done it to that extent only, it was a proof of concept, the principle can be extended for any required sample size in order to get more precise weights and that is precisely what has been done.
Knowing the mass of the isotope you can simply weigh out however many trillion you need to conduct the experiment.
And the experiments have been conducted so many fucking times in various independent labs all around the globe now with such a high degree of accuracy that your arguments just look like the ramblings of intellectual cowards hiding vehemently behind their supposed 'inherent' bible.
.