(July 19, 2015 at 1:31 pm)Cato Wrote:I've read the article hmmm nice article(July 19, 2015 at 1:22 pm)huss88ein Wrote: Just give me a chance to see for myself that's all I'm asking , you are supposed to be happy about this discussion as it giving u the opposite point of view instead of just circulating the same point of view with members who have the same ideas .
You are suffering from the same misconception that many Christians suffer from; namely, the assumption that we haven't heard any of this before. This applies to the claims and the rationalized apologetics.
You are essentially single sourcing your entire philosophy yet have the audacity to tell me I'm the one circulating the same point of view?
lots of information .
Ok let's start by the epigenetics why they're using that simple because genetic explanation fails to explain the phenomenon so they r trying to find a new and more rational explanation giving the fact that identical twins are only 20% of times only are both homosexual so they go to epigenetics.
But where is the problem in that theory first epigenetics(coming from parents) are erased during the development of germ cells and replaced withe new ones soon after fertilization so why should these stay .
Girls with CAH tend to display masculinized genitalia not homosexuality if they're suggesting that sensitivity to androgen is less then where is the proof ? They're just speculations as there is no evidence that these two factors can coexist to develop homosexuality .
Seriously it's a nice article but it lacks Data .
