New theory on Aboigenesis

[One Above All]

Yeah, this oversimplification is absurd. I'm all for abiogenesis (after all, for life to always come for life, life must have always existed - which we know isn't true - so life must have come from non-life), but they make it sound like you just need light and any random assortment of atoms to get life. This is as much a theory as string theory. No testable predictions makes it little more than a hypothesis.

Well this is just a brief article on the subject, it also says it's "backed by mathematical research and a proposal that can be put to the test."

String "theory" is also backed by mathematics. In fact, it's mathematically perfect. Doesn't mean it's an actual theory. However, I missed the "put to the test" part in this article. I anxiously await the results.

---

If someone from MIT said their research showed that Tiberius's farts smelled like roses and that disproved God, a lot of you atheists would be making the same claim you are making above.

Who the fuck is Tiberius, and why do you assume atheists are as gullible as creationists? Atheists don't blindly accept science, since the two have no relation to one another. I've questioned science before, and will continue to do so, just as I've done here. I've even questioned math, which is ridiculous (in math, proof can actually be given). Don't project your gullible nature onto any of us.