10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer

[Godscreated]

 It doesn't matter whether I believe in those things or not, I'm neither trying to prove or disprove them and I've said many times that I can not prove God to an atheist's satisfaction. Neither can an atheist disprove God to my satisfaction. There is a huge difference in the two though. I know that God exist and so an atheist could never disprove that which exists regardless of what the atheist thinks. Those who say that God doesn't exist make a positive statement, it then becomes their responsibility to prove the statement they made, it isn't nor ever has been the responsibility of the other person to disprove the statement in any type of argument. Because the atheists can't disprove God they want to move the responsibility of their doubt on the Christian, only in an argument about God does the burden of the atheist's belief become the responsibility of the Christian. I've been here a lot longer than you have and have every right to be here, so just calm down or just quit reading my posts.

You're the only one getting worked up here, maybe you should take your own advice and stop reading my posts? In the post I was responding to, you said I had no proof that god didn't exist. My point about the leprechauns is that you don't need evidence of non-existence to be pretty positive that something doesn't exist. There is no evidence for the existence of leprechauns or unicorns so I am confident in saying that I don't believe they exist. You keep saying that you know god exists, but you provide zero evidence to back up that claim. So until someone can provide evidence of god's existence, I can't believe he exists.

 I'm not getting worked up and I'm not sure why you think that. Like I said in my post above I see no evidence of unicorns or leprechauns and thus do not believe in them. I have and do see evidence of God in creation and the more I learn about the creation the more I see Him. I know that atheist believe in evolution and thus reject God through this belief, however there's so much about animals that is impossible for evolution to be involved. For one, some animals according to evolutionary science haven't changed in many millions of years. What happened to the process in them?  I see no evidence for evolution and would have a hard time trusting the science because the definition of evolution changes when it's convenient to rebut science that is contrary to what is believed by evolutionary science, so I can't believe in it.

GC