clemdog14 Wrote:I tried to answer your reply in giving an alternate view to how I see good. I was not trying to duck out of your replay.I like this conversations, they are helping me out and explaining some of my flaws in my reasoning.Let's point out some of those flaws, then:
Quote:i tried to answer your reply in giving an alternate view to how I see good.Flaw: providing only views(or any views)
Flaw: attempting to give an alternate view which still describes the same thing. We understood you're view the first time, no need to reword it.
Quote:I cannot give direct physical evidence for the existence of my God. It is more on the lines of faith.Flaw: Continuing to acknowledge the "faith" as a reason.
Quote:It's interesting. Even though I don't have direct evidence, I still rationally believe that God exists. It's really an absurdity if you think about it.Flaw: you believe that you "rationally" believe in a god. This is not rational. It's not even reasoned.
If there was honesty in this quote, then I would say you're on your way to clear thought on the subject. You have to drop the views and unproven claims first, though.
