I think we've both misunderstood each other. You mean to say there's no surviving species that is completely not procreating? Yes there is none I didn't claim that there is, it was a hypothetical first posed by you and then by me for different reasons.
But, homosexuality exists in most species. Because homosexuality increases a population's fitness. It's not "against" nature, it is valuable for our survival. So don't misrepresent the evidence to support your argument.
But, homosexuality exists in most species. Because homosexuality increases a population's fitness. It's not "against" nature, it is valuable for our survival. So don't misrepresent the evidence to support your argument.