Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 15, 2024, 4:04 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Question for our resident creationist(s)
#59
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 14, 2013 at 3:04 pm)ronedee Wrote:
(August 14, 2013 at 1:40 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Okay, I praised you in another thread, but now we're right back to fighting: Are you fucking kidding me with this shit? This is your answer?

However, I'm going to do something you apparently didn't feel the need to do, and I'm going to treat you as if you have some intellectual curiosity and mental acuity. Here's a water formation in space that's billions of times bigger than the Earth. Isn't that cool?

The other strange thing is that you'll disagree out of hand about the commonness of water, despite standing on a planet that's mostly water, using a body that's mostly water. Just saying.

Thanks for something.

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe. But, to make water is vurtuially a miracle!

So, if we are talking "liquid" NOT H2O, that's something else!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Properties_of_water

Uh, no, making water is not a miracle. It merely requires a temperature necessary for it to be in liquid form, and given how many stars there are, and how many planets surrounding them, the likelihood of other planets having liquid water is astronomically high to the point that it might as well be 1:1. In fact, there is mounting evidence for liquid water being located under the surfaces of numerous moons and dwarf planets in our own solar system, and even on Mars: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasonal_fl...ian_slopes

See, I love it when people who have no fucking clue what the fuck they're talking about try to pretend like they know what they're talking about. It's like a toddler trying to tell me that because someone leaves presents under their tree and eats the milk and cookies that they know Santa is real, except in this case I am under no impression that I need to tolerate your delusion.

It's hilarious how tightly creationists will cling to whatever little crevice they imagine is empty of scientific information to try to strengthen their stance, completely unaware of the fact that the juggernaut that is scientific progress is coming towards them with all the speed and force of a fully-loaded, fully-accelerated freight train, and that the crevice itself is actually growing scientific facts as well.

Well, okay, it would be hilarious if it wasn't unbelievably pathetic.

Are you aware that every authoritative figure in your religious hierarchy educated on the topics of science upon which they speak constantly state that such theories are completely valid and true? Every single Catholic bishop, cardinal, diocese, and pope educated in biology and evolution has stated that evolution is an undeniable fact? Maybe you should start paying attention to your leaders. After all, aren't they supposed to be the authority figures which you are supposed to put all confidence into?

The fact you are not leaves me with only one label to slap on you.

HERETIC.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 18, 2013 at 4:26 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 13, 2013 at 11:16 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 13, 2013 at 11:28 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by tokutter - August 15, 2013 at 9:48 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Psykhronic - August 13, 2013 at 11:48 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 13, 2013 at 12:03 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 13, 2013 at 6:03 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by LastPoet - August 13, 2013 at 8:10 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Bad Wolf - August 13, 2013 at 9:38 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by LastPoet - August 14, 2013 at 5:24 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 14, 2013 at 11:01 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Jackalope - August 14, 2013 at 11:21 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ITChick - August 14, 2013 at 11:26 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Jackalope - August 14, 2013 at 11:31 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 14, 2013 at 1:40 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 14, 2013 at 3:04 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Chas - August 14, 2013 at 4:26 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 15, 2013 at 3:55 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Creed of Heresy - August 18, 2013 at 12:49 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 19, 2013 at 1:52 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 19, 2013 at 3:13 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 19, 2013 at 2:04 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by gall - August 19, 2013 at 2:15 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 19, 2013 at 2:19 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Bad Wolf - August 19, 2013 at 2:44 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 19, 2013 at 11:22 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 20, 2013 at 2:44 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Chas - August 19, 2013 at 11:04 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Psykhronic - August 19, 2013 at 11:11 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by gall - August 19, 2013 at 11:18 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Chas - August 14, 2013 at 2:25 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Chas - August 14, 2013 at 2:37 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Bad Wolf - August 13, 2013 at 12:41 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Psykhronic - August 13, 2013 at 12:22 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Minimalist - August 13, 2013 at 11:44 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Simon Moon - August 13, 2013 at 12:06 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Minimalist - August 13, 2013 at 12:49 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Psykhronic - August 14, 2013 at 11:04 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Lucanus - August 14, 2013 at 3:22 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Nine - August 18, 2013 at 5:46 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Mystical - August 19, 2013 at 4:43 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 19, 2013 at 8:02 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 19, 2013 at 3:14 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 19, 2013 at 3:25 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Tonus - August 19, 2013 at 3:30 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Cyberman - August 19, 2013 at 6:53 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Bad Writer - August 19, 2013 at 10:20 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by ronedee - August 20, 2013 at 10:44 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Psykhronic - August 20, 2013 at 10:50 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Foxaèr - August 20, 2013 at 10:54 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Esquilax - August 20, 2013 at 11:08 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Bad Wolf - August 19, 2013 at 6:03 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Bad Writer - August 19, 2013 at 11:29 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Jackalope - August 20, 2013 at 12:54 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Bad Wolf - August 20, 2013 at 5:44 am
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Jackalope - August 20, 2013 at 12:36 pm
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s) - by Bad Writer - August 20, 2013 at 12:08 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Creationist Equivocation Objectivist 28 3119 December 24, 2022 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
Bug The Voyage That Shook The World (2009) - Creationist BS masquerading as science Duty 7 704 September 8, 2020 at 5:32 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The Creationist that Ken Ham calls "stupid" drfuzzy 3 1775 May 7, 2016 at 8:23 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  A Creationist answered 10 questions . . . drfuzzy 26 7899 December 11, 2015 at 10:18 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  search Science Related topics Dinosaur Creationist: The Flintstones was a zebo-the-fat 24 4585 May 28, 2015 at 9:23 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Hope For Our Resident Jesus Freaks? Minimalist 2 1387 September 29, 2014 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Creationist Senators block fossil bill Bittersmart 119 22979 April 5, 2014 at 10:42 pm
Last Post: ThomM
  Pat Robertson implores creationist Ken Ham to shut up Gooders1002 24 4561 February 10, 2014 at 7:53 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  If these resident theists really talk to god.. Brakeman 283 83268 October 1, 2013 at 8:47 pm
Last Post: Drich
  Do creationist know that what they are doing is wrong? Nerd 3 1983 March 24, 2013 at 9:33 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)