(October 23, 2013 at 2:04 am)FallentoReason Wrote: Strawman. I wasn't talking about the nature of truth, let alone truth itself. I was simply talking about the event where an agent confesses that they believe something e.g. the proposition that "Rowan Atkinson is funny". As it stands, naturalism can't account for such a thing to be possible purely from a physical p.o.v.
Actually, you were. If you're saying that the brain on naturalism is incapable of having beliefs, which you specifically noted in an earlier post on page 26 that it was because "How can *atoms* be about things?", which is about the nature of truth (i.e correspondence).