Argument #2: Evolution Of Species

[Esquilax]

The problem with this argument that existed 50 years ago still is present today. That should tell you something. To me it screams.

This is the problem with you, Rev: you present this argument in your first post, and the response has unanimously been that science has advanced considerably in fifty years, and that the lack of evidence Kerkut mentions no longer exists, that in fact, there is plenty of evidence now. Many of us linked you to that evidence. Your response back is "but the argument still exists, therefore it must be true!"

Your inability to understand what is being said to you, does it stem from ignorance, or disinterest? We understand that the argument still exists, but unfortunately for you, the objection it raises no longer does. Anybody raising this argument today is just speaking nonsense, akin to somebody letting us know that standing on the earth, it looks like a flat disc, is an argument for a flat earth. Our understanding of the subject has moved on.

Incidentally, would you please respond to this point I made on page six, that you completely skipped over?

But let's have some fun with this: all I said was "human chromosome 2," that was literally the extent of my allusion to genetics. You could have looked it up because that was plenty to light a google search up, but instead you just tell me about "similarities," a word that I never used, and actually- and this is the smoking gun for how little you know what you're talking about- isn't applicable to the situation at hand anyway.

You told me that similarities in genetics doesn't constitute proof, when the thing I was talking about has nothing to do with similarities. Be honest, Rev: did you even look up human chromosome 2 before you responded?

What is it, and why are scientists claiming that it's proof of our common ancestry with apes? It's certainly not because the chromosome is similar to ape chromosomes, so... why? What information do you have on this right now, before you look it up for the first time now you've been called out, and why did you think it was okay to disagree with me without even knowing what we were disagreeing on?

Are you that completely lazy and dishonest that you won't even do a cursory wikipedia search on the things people point you to, in a thread you've made ostensibly about people debating these issues with you?

Have you even opened a single other link that's been posted to you on this thread?