RE: Q about arguments for God's existence.
June 21, 2015 at 2:44 pm
(This post was last modified: June 21, 2015 at 2:45 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(June 21, 2015 at 9:07 am)Neimenovic Wrote: 'We don't know' doesn't give you a free pass to accept the most improbable theory. And improbability is not a question of personal judgement.
You thinking that my theory (supernatural element) is more improbably than your theory (things came form nothing, or have always existed), is an opinion.
I believe the opposite. Neither one of us has proof for either.
(June 21, 2015 at 2:41 pm)Rhythm Wrote: The weak theory of "I don't know"......? Validity does not hinge upon opinion. You're clearly having trouble...with words.
The theory that the first ever "thing" to ever have existed either came from nothing, or has always been... without believing in a supernatural element at play..
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh