RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2)
December 14, 2014 at 5:48 pm
(This post was last modified: December 14, 2014 at 5:49 pm by Jackalope.)
(December 14, 2014 at 5:08 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(December 14, 2014 at 4:57 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You aren't part of the audience, jackass. Of course you're convinced by your own argument.
Reading comprehension. I am the audience when it comes to judging whether or not the objections that you people make hold weight to my arguments, which they don't.
Your sample size is too small.
(December 14, 2014 at 5:08 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(December 14, 2014 at 4:57 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Care to name one person in the thread, besides yourself, who was convinced?
No not in the thread, but I can give statistical data which show that over 2 billion people in this world IS convinced. So this thread isn't even one half of a pepperoni on a very large pizza.
Ah, so by your very own logic, there are more than 5 billion people who *don't* agree with you.
(December 14, 2014 at 5:08 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: So in other words, what I am saying is...on a small scale, people agree with you, but on a large scale, people agree with me.
And you're still wrong about the facts on that.
(not that argument ad populum isn't a logical fallacy or anything)
In addition, you also claimed you could present data which supported your claim that most historians believe in a historic Jesus, and I not that you utterly failed to support that claim.
Baseless assertion is baseless.
