(December 16, 2014 at 3:34 am)Alex K Wrote: Chad IS trying to subtly criticise Beccs' post using what he thinks is an analogously wrong statement which mirrors the format of the former? Hopefully?
Would love to give him the benefit of the doubt in this manner, but eugenics is too misplaced for the assumed purpose. Instead he should have found another literary faux pas (perahps even with a reference to Lamarck), or at least something that invokes the concept of dishonesty.
Considering Chad's beliefs, God is the one practicing eugenics; Darwin is just pointing it out.
