RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 5:26 pm
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2015 at 6:21 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(February 21, 2015 at 12:55 am)xr34p3rx Wrote: This argument is a bit confusing to me at the moment. Could someone be kind enough to explain it a bit or give a video or link to an article breaking it down.
The numbers they get as results are bunk because they pretend as if there weren't trillions of molecules simultaneously reacting. They pretend that it was one molecule continuously morphing directly from hydrogen dioxide to unicellular life to Albert Einstein teaching at Princeton.
(February 21, 2015 at 1:16 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(February 21, 2015 at 2:43 am)robvalue Wrote: There is no reason to think the universe could have been anything other than what it is.
Careful, Rob. Starting with that premise leads to God.
Nah.
(February 21, 2015 at 1:16 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(February 21, 2015 at 2:43 am)robvalue Wrote: Basically, there is nothing in mathematics that represents "God".
True. Because God is why mathematics exists in the first place.
lol, now we know your god is evil -- he invented calculus.
Oh, wait, that was Newton and Spinoza.
(February 21, 2015 at 9:01 pm)Wiggy Wrote: 30% of the world are christian who believe Jesus is the son of God and died on a cross for our sins and rose again. All books in the bible agree to thesame thing despite being written by different authors at diff times. Old testament Iis full of fulfilled prophecies about Jesus. All OT prophecies were fulfilled thats y they were true prophets and their word will live forever.
On the other hand evilutions are always changing their stories about fossils. Thats why its crap. I would suggest subscibing to creation.com. it completely and utterly destroys evolution scientifically.
You apparently don't get the concept of conforming one's information to comport with reality.
That's okay, you'll grow up one day. Well, hopefully.