RE: If there is a creator, so what?
November 15, 2016 at 11:22 am
(This post was last modified: November 15, 2016 at 12:03 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 15, 2016 at 10:21 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(November 15, 2016 at 10:05 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Well maybe he is different with me. There's always his responses to me to check.
I'm not going to reread the thread from your perspective.
And I don't expect you to. I was saying that everyone can see from their own perspective how badly he dealt with me. But again, you're all welcome to enjoy how he treats you.
Jor Wrote:He doesn't have a right to be selective in what he responds to? I think you're reading motive and intent into what sounds like your disappointment in his responses to you.
Of course he has a right to be selective. I never said otherwise. It's the way he's doing it. When I make an effort to address him and he ignores all but one of my questions each time that isn't debating properly.
Jor Wrote:That's a non sequitur.
No because it's an opinion based on my observation of him not an attempt at a logically entailed conclusion. The fact that he only addresses one line of my post each time, is, in my opinion, him ignoring what he can't handle.
Jor Wrote:That must be it. There couldn't be any other reason for the curtness of his responses.[/sarcasm]
Well his being a prick to me when I was decent to him and addressing him directly certainly makes it look like it. Both my posts were perfectly reasonable and the first response I got was his ignoring everything I said and talking about how things had gone in the thread according to him when I'd always addressed him properly the whole time... and he ignored all my questions. The second post he only answered one part of my post by saying he'd already answered it and ignored the rest of my post. Then he condescended me by saying he believed in my ability to catch up. Well I certainly don't believe in his ability to treat me decently when I treat him decently. As long as he's not being a prick to you guys you can all enjoy him.
You don't have to have my perspective to see two posts where I addressed him perfectly reasonably and his responses didn't address me at all and the second one was both ignorant and condescending.
I'm just saying that someone isn't exactly intellectually honest if they only behave that way when it suits them towards people they like. And he has no reason to dislike me because I didn't have a problem with him until he started reacting to my reasonableness so poorly.