RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
October 19, 2016 at 10:56 am
(October 18, 2016 at 12:03 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 17, 2016 at 6:02 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Bold mine:That's crap..
There is no distinguishable difference between "forced sex" and "rape" with regard to the harm it causes those who are on the receiving end of such an act.
Consent is the difference.
Some people like the 'fight/struggle.'
Alot of traditional Asian sexual culture is based on this type of sexual experience. Boarder line rape is almost like missionary sex here.
A woman is not suppose to like/enjoy sex in a traditional context. the hook, for the guy is to be so good that he can make her drop the cultural values and force his partner to enjoy themselves.
The point being forced sex is not always rape. What makes it rape is consent which points back to my original argument that consent is the only difference between rape and any other type of sex. And you can not prove consent.
Apologies if I'm repeating anyone, or myself, I'm just thoroughly catching up here.
Drich, you seem to have a real issue with definitions here. You want to twist "forced" to include certain instances of role play/"forced" consensual sex? Okay. Fine. Take that one for the win if you want. It's totally irrelevant anyhow. It's a distraction. You knew EXACTLY what I meant by my statement about the pain and suffering of a victim. Playing semantics doesn't really get you any closer to refuting (or even addressing) that point. I'm happy to re-word it in a manner that better suits your understanding of word meanings, if you like:
There is no distinguishable difference between "non-consensual sex" and "rape" with regard to the harm it causes those who are on the receiving end of such an act.
Do we understand each other now?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.