CATHOLICS, heads up if you were abused by your priest!......

[Godscreated]

PART. TWO

Not only did your killing natured Jesus call them hypocrites for not following the law in murdering children for cursing their parents, he stated the following, to wit: "These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules.” (Matthew 15:8-9)“their teachings are merely human rules, inferring where Jesus’ father Yahweh’s teachings of murdering children that curse their parents is not because it was Yahweh inspired!  GET IT?

First Jesus doesn't have a killing nature, you need to establish this before you claim it. Children were not being murder because of this law, another claim you haven't established. You also haven't established your definition of cursed and why or why not it deserves the penalty stated in Ex. 21:17. Please do so that this argument might have more clarity.
Now to address your above statement. As I established in part one earlier today, Jesus called them hypocrites because the Pharisees established a traditional law (one of their own making and not of God) that they used to get around the law set by God in Ex. 21:17. You yourself established this by quoting Matt. 15:8-9, which you misinterpreted, something that has been your habit throughout your posts to me. You need to come to a definite decision, you use Ex. 21:17 to call God a murderer because He established he law in this verse, then you turn around and say it's a law established by the Pharisees in your statement above. So please make up your mind, who established this particular law? Please do not use your typical double standards or misinterpretations, it's a simple question that requires only a simply answer. Yes I understand these verses and the order they were established and the reasoning behind them, it's truly shame that you want to deny these truths given by your creator.

Exodus 21:17 is not about small children its about adults who are the children of their elders .......you're trying to make these verses sound as if they were about small children being punished by death when nothing could be further from the truth.
Your scriptural understanding is weak at best and I say its nonexistent.....”

ICON’S REFUTATION:  Regarding your ever so wanting statements shown in the above quote, can you show us BIBLICALLY where your laughable notions above have foundation?  Otherwise, it is nothing more than wishful thinking and conjecture on your part to try in vain to spin doctor very disturbing biblical facts away, AGAIN! Why do you allow yourself to be embarrassed in this way?
I’ll await a cogent response this time, that is after you un-ravel yourself from turning yourself into a pretzel in trying in vain to remove those damn disturbing LITERAL biblical passages within your primitive Bronze and Iron Age bible and thinking!

I've not embarrassed myself, I have established your complete ignorance of the scriptures and will continue too, as long as you insist on continuing in your ignorance.
As I said earlier in this post I would address Ex. 21:17 and Levi. 20:9 again. As I said earlier neither of those verses actually uses the word children, though I agree there is without a doubt what is implied. Now why leave out the word 'children,' so the people who this was originally written to would know that these verses meant grown children (years from about 15 and up). When a verse in the OT referred to young children, one of the Hebrew words meaning child was used most of the time, unless the plural 'children' was necessary. Almost every time the word children is used in the OT it refers to adults' doubt me then go and read Exodus and Leviticus where the majority of the laws were given. If you believe the word children used in the OT always means a small child you are more ignorant than I thought.

Yahweh’s Child, 2+2=4, oil and water don’t mix, and your thinking is that of a deceiving pseudo-christian apologetic that tries in vain to rewrite your pagan bible to try and save face.  Understand one very simple concept, you will NEVER be able to defend the indefensible bible in the 21st century, period!

The Bible doesn't need to be defended, it is a book of absolute truth. So you see my intention wasn't to defend the Bible, it was to show your ignorance of scripture and offer the meaning of verses you have no idea what they mean. I took it as my duty to show your arrogance toward and your ignorance of scripture and there is no doubt I've done so. I think it's ashame you're not willing to listen to others, you've ragged around here like you know more than anyone else atheist and Christian alike. You're not going to get along with others here with an attitude of superiority and you may not be here long either. You made a challenge to Christians here on our ability to know the Bible I took it on and showed you we are very capabn against boobs like you.

For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.” (2 Timothy 4:3)

Why would you bring up a verse that condemns you as much as it does for the supposed Christians mingled in the church of yesterday, today and tomorrow. Your lack of biblical understanding is appalling.

Now I want be responding to you in this thread, I believe I've proven what I set out to do and frankly I'm tired of trying to respond to you with all the crap you do with your posts, makes it difficult to respond to especially when working from a small tablet, my computer is down and this is all I have to work with at this time.

GC