RE: "The Arrival" (Spoiler Free(cause I haven't seen it))
February 6, 2017 at 4:22 pm
(This post was last modified: February 6, 2017 at 4:23 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
There's also the fact that I'm extremely biased and I welcome that and embrace that rather than irrationally fight against my own irrational nature. Which would be essentially fighting against my own nature. Which is irrational. Because my nature is irrational and fighting against my nature is irrational regardless of how irrational my nature is.
Fighting against my own bias is even more irrational than accepting it and being biased. WHEN my bias is too strong to be controlled and I'm essentially banging my head against a proverbial brick wall because for starters I DON'T WANT to control my bias.
If a family member or friend wants to do or have something that I consider technically extremely midlly immoral from an objective perspective. I don't give too fucks if that's my opinion. What's most important to me is them getting what they want.
It's immoral of me, IMO, to value my friends and family above strangers. I think that's immoral. But there's no fucking way I'm not going to continue to be biased in favor of my friends and family. Especially my friends. Fuck genetics.
I'm selfish. And most of all what my selfish desires want is for other people I care about the most, my greatest friends, to have whatever they want. Regardless of morality. Provided that it's not like super criminal or something lol. BUT.... my friends would never want that.
Anyway I'm drunk. Don't hate me. Lol.
The nonexistence of moral relevance is identical to moral perfection as far as I'm concerned. Nonexistence=moral perfection.
It's also extremely undesirable because I'm a selfish ape.
Fighting against my own bias is even more irrational than accepting it and being biased. WHEN my bias is too strong to be controlled and I'm essentially banging my head against a proverbial brick wall because for starters I DON'T WANT to control my bias.
If a family member or friend wants to do or have something that I consider technically extremely midlly immoral from an objective perspective. I don't give too fucks if that's my opinion. What's most important to me is them getting what they want.
It's immoral of me, IMO, to value my friends and family above strangers. I think that's immoral. But there's no fucking way I'm not going to continue to be biased in favor of my friends and family. Especially my friends. Fuck genetics.
I'm selfish. And most of all what my selfish desires want is for other people I care about the most, my greatest friends, to have whatever they want. Regardless of morality. Provided that it's not like super criminal or something lol. BUT.... my friends would never want that.
Anyway I'm drunk. Don't hate me. Lol.
(February 6, 2017 at 4:22 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(February 6, 2017 at 4:18 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Basically.... I think that from a completely unbiased objective morality perspective nonexistence is most ideal because it leads to zero suffering and suffering is more morally relevant than happiness.
But I couldn't care less and think people should do what they want and have kids anyway.
Because I'm not a robot.
In the absence of existence moral condemnation or praise is irrelevent...there's nothing to condemn or praise. A lack of suffering due to non-existence is not a lack of suffering, it's a lack of existence.
The nonexistence of moral relevance is identical to moral perfection as far as I'm concerned. Nonexistence=moral perfection.
It's also extremely undesirable because I'm a selfish ape.
