(September 29, 2017 at 11:29 am)SteveII Wrote:(September 29, 2017 at 11:19 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: So, as long as somebody is convinced, it validates the argument?!
The arguments are successful pieces of reasoning. Jorm's comment was that we need additional reasons because inferring God into existence is not compelling.
The arguments are successful pieces of reasoning if the assumptions that underlie them are valid. I don't recall you or anyone else demonstrating they are.
Garbage in, garbage out.